[1764-84 Goermans 3-4 view] [University of Edinburgh]

Russell Collection of Early
Keyboard Instruments

St Cecilia's Hall, Niddry Street, Cowgate, Edinburgh EH1 1LJ


[HD5-JG1763.29 Harpsichord]
HD5-JG1763.29: Double-manual harpsichord,
Jean Goermans/Pascal Taskin. Paris, 1763/83-84.


Soundboard Restoration Report

Contents


ABSTRACT
Restoration of the painted soundboard of the 1764/83 Goermans/Taskin harpsichord.

[Restoration Plan View] The mouldings and the interior of the casework which surrounded the soundboard, were cleaned of surface dirt and polished. The soundboard was cleaned of a layer of dirt and soft resin varnish. Three distinct types of repaints, none of which had been isolated, were discovered and removed. They mainly occurred on groups on the wrestplank and along the bentside. The chrysanthemum beside the wreath had been damaged, but the wreath itself and the groups between the bridges had survived in good order. Two of the added groups between the nuts were removed as not being original. The third, although also not original, was left in situ. The tulip between the nuts and the registers, which was a total repaint, was removed and replaced with one more in keeping with the style of the soundboard Additions had been made along the lower edge of the bird group and when these were removed, traces of the original scalloped border decoration was found. This confirmed that the soundboard originally had the usual type of scalloped decoration and it is believed that this was removed at the time of the 1783 rebuild. It is also likely that the soundboard was stained at this time. After the damaged groups had been reconstructed, the soundboard and wrestplank were varnished.


NOTE TO READERS
THE RESTORATION METHODS DESCRIBED IN THIS DOCUMENT ARE A RECORD OF THE TECHNIQUES AND MATERIALS USED IN THIS RESTORATION, AND WHICH WERE FOUND SAFE IN THE PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES OF THEIR APPLICATION. THEY ARE NOT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR USE BY OTHER PEOPLE ON OTHER OBJECTS. RESTORATION TECHNIQUES CAN BE DANGEROUS, AND THE AUTHORS ACCEPT NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR DAMAGE TO OBJECTS OR TO OPERATIVES RESULTING FROM THE APPLICATION OF THE TECHNIQUES DESCRIBED BELOW.

CONDITION OF THE SOUNBOARD IN MARCH 1976, PRIOR TO CLEANING
A good deal of rather greasy, black surface dirt was present which dulled the surface of the varnish and made it appear darker than it really was. The varnish, which formed an homogenous, uncrazed film, had been thickly applied to the soundboard wood and to the wrestplank, but not to the bridges or nuts, although these, too, were dark. There were rough passages in the varnished wood in a number of places as though the surface of the wood had not been properly smoothed when the varnish was applied or as though sawdust had become incorporated into the wet varnish.

The paint appeared to be in good condition in that it was not showing any signs of curling or flaking. Shims had been inserted to repair splits in the soundboard in a number of places and some of these passed through painted areas. Notably through the leaves of the anemone in the tail; through the pomegranate flower at the treble end of the soundboard; through the leaves of the carnation near the wreath; through the right-hand end of the bird group and through the bird itself. The flower at the treble end of the wrestplank had obviously been repainted at some time because it was completely different in style from the remainder of the painting and of much poorer quality (P 709.D.6/55) (Plate 6). This was also the case with the tulip at the bass end (P 710.D.6/55) (Plate 8). The soundboard was inspected, both through a red filter, and under an ultra violet lamp, but the varnish was sufficiently thick to mask the paint and no further information could be gained.

Cleaning
The whole soundboard and the wrestplank were first gone over with Robersons C.R.P. paste on large pads of cotton wool until no more black deposit came away. This treatment considerably improved the appearance of the surface of the varnish, but did not increase its transparency significantly, nor lighten the overall brown colour enough to make it worth considering leaving the varnish undisturbed.

The layer of darkened varnish would respond slowly to 35% acetone in white spirit, but could be most effectively removed by using pure acetone, either on a swab - for the plain wood - or by rolling to gel the varnish and then removing the gelled coating with white spirit. This method was found to be safest for the painted areas because it involved the least possible abrasion of the surface. It also had the advantage of not affecting the repaints. The rolling, if repeated once or twice, removed nearly all the varnish, but a little tended to remain in the indentations of the grain of the wood. This was not difficult to remove if attacked with solvent within two or three days. Residue became more stubborn if left for a week or more however, and could no longer be removed with acetone. It was necessary to check the soundboard for traces of varnish with a U.V. lamp because it was almost impossible to see the residue in normal light. The granular passages referred to earlier came away when the varnish was removed, leaving the surface of the wood perfectly smooth. In spite of the preliminary cleaning with wax paste, a substantial layer of black dirt remained, either on, or incorporated in, the top of the varnish layer.During cleaning, traces of an earlier, tougher, varnish layer were uncovered. These could be removed if treated straight away, along with the top layer of varnish, but were much more difficult to remove if left until afterwards. A scalpel was used to take off the last fragments of this older coating from the impasto of some of the flowers. During cleaning it became clear that many of the flower groups had been damaged in the course of previous cleanings and repairs, and that these areas had all been overpainted and in some cases altered.

The soundboard stain
During varnish removal we realised that the soundboard wood was not going to regain its normal light pine colour, and that some kind of stain must have been applied to it. Examination under U.V. showed that the stain was not part of yet another varnish layer, and attempts to remove it with a wide range of solvents, and combinations of solvents, failed. It was slightly responsive to brushing with a fibreglass brush, but although using this technique the colour of smooth parts of the soundboard could be improved, those where rough grain was present were unaffected and the final result of the treatment would have been to make the wood extremely patchy. We experimentally removed the stain from a very small area beside a resist and this confirmed our fear that if the staining was removed it would lessen the contrast between the light resist areas and the dark of the stained wood to the point where the former would be no longer visible, (see also section on resists). We also realised that if brushing was resorted to on such a large scale it would have the effect of removing much of the soft early wood and leave the harder late wood standing in ridges, effectively reversing the original state of the surface. The final argument was that it was not known when the staining was applied and it was quite possible that it was contemporary with the rebuilding of the instrument in 1783. It was ultimately left undisturbed for this reason.

The repainted groups
The retouchings on the soundboard appeared to fall into quite distinct categories. Each group required a different technique for its removal from the original paint, and this, together with their insolubility in water, their reaction under U.V. illumination, and their association with repairs to the soundboard, formed criteria for distinguishing them from each other and from the original paint. We suspected that the very facilely painted white touches which were present on many of the flowers, particularly those in the wreath, were not original and may have been added at the time of the Taskin rebuild to add sparkle to a slightly dull-toned soundboard. This paint is unlike any of the other retouches in that it is water soluble, like the original paint, but it has been applied so that it has an impasto quality which is foreign to the remainder of the soundboard painting. Close examination of, for example, the blue flower in the wreath, shows that the overlying brushstrokes do not always follow, or complement, the form of the flower beneath. No attempt was made to remove the white touches.

Type I repaint was the most easily removable; it could be dissolved in pure acetone, and for this reason may have been the most recent. In one place it occurred on top of the layer of old, hardened varnish (on the leaves of the Sweet William) and may have been applied to conceal it. This suggests that the varnish had been imperfectly removed during an earlier cleaning, and had been rediscovered by the restorer who applied the type I repaint. This repaint occurred as a bluish-red glaze layer on several of the red flowers, applied apparently to add modelling, since it did not always conceal damage. Where it occurred as a green paint it had been used to conceal wear on stems, and some of the ribbon-like leaves had been covered with it, simplifying their forms.

Type II repaint consisted of an extremely hard, dry-surfaced paint which could only be removed with morpholine. It was characterised by its lack of match (bluish-green paint of this type had been used to touch up the yellowish-green leaves of a number of the flower groups); by its amateurish modelling (see photographs of the repainted groups on the wrestplank); and by the fact that the green areas of this repaint absorbed U.V. strongly, appearing almost black. It occurred in association with repairs to the soundboard where a number of short shims had been used, and it had also been used on top of the added strip at the base of the bird group.

Type III repaint occurred as a darkened, glossy, tough layer which may have been pigment in retouching varnish. It could only be removed with a mixture of acetone, diacetone alcohol and methyl-ethyl-ketone. It occurred in association with the repair which passed through the bird, and it had been used to add to the bird and tree group to bring it down to the edge of the soundboard. It had also been used to repair damage to stems leaves and buds over the rest of the soundboard. Where it occurred as a dark green it absorbed U.V. strongly, similarly to the bright green repaints of type II. Unfortunately it did not occur anywhere in association either with type I repaint, or with the old, incompletely removed varnish.

RETOUCHING AND VARNISHING.

Anemone de Caen at the treble end of the wrestplank
This flower had been overpainted with blue and red type II repaint modelled into a greyish white ground. The layer of repaint was so thick that the wrestpin plugs, which had been cut down flush with it prior to cleaning, stood proud again after the repaint was taken off. P 709.D.6/55 (Plate 6) shows the flower with the repaint still in position. When this was removed it was found that only about a third of the original flower had survived (see P 716.D.6/55) (Plate 6). Underneath the repaint, covering the bare wood and some of the original paint, was a blackened, tarry layer, the remains of which can still be seen in the grain of the wood in the photograph. This may have been a filler, since the wood seemed to be very worn in this area, and the ridges of the late wood stood up strongly. We filled the indentations with a putty made with precipitated chalk rabbit skin glue, pigment and a small quantity of oil. This was smoothed off and allowed to harden before the reconstruction of the missing part of the flower was commenced. P 769.D.6/55 (Plate 7) shows the flower after completion of the reconstruction.

Tulip at the bass end of the wrestplank behind the 4' nut, and the group beside it between the 4' and 8' nut.
In both instances there were 'resists' present beside and beneath the paint. P 710.D.6/55 (Plate 8) shows these and also the poor quality of the type II repaints, particularly of the flower of the tulip. P 711.D.6/55 (Plate 8) shows the strong absorption of U.V. by the green leaves, and the fairly bright fluorescence of the white and light coloured areas.

Careful inspection and test cleaning of small sections of the flowers and foliage of these groups revealed that no original paint had survived beneath the repaint in either case. It was decided therefore to remove the repainted tulip and to replace it with a tulip which was closer to the rest of the flower painting in style (P 766.D.6/55) (Plate 7). The other group was left untouched in order to retain an example of the repaint in accordance with a policy of preserving evidence of the past history of the instrument.

The two remaining groups between the 4' and 8' nuts.
These were finally proved to be later additions for the reasons given below. The group which consisted of leaves only, almost certainly belonged to type III (P 720.D.6/55) (Plate 9). The other flower group (P 721.D.6/55) (Plate 9) is likely to have been added at the same time and therefore probably also belonged to type III.

  1. Unlike any of the other groups there were no resists round them.
  2. They both absorbed U.V. in a way characteristic of other, proven repaints.
  3. When the repaint was removed there was no trace of anything else underneath.
  4. There would not have been room for them between the nuts as well as the scalloped decoration which is now known to have been present on the soundboard before Taskin's restoration, and forwhich scribed guidelines exist on the wrestplank.
  5. The quality of the painting of all these repainted groups was noticeably poorer than that of the remainder.
  6. At the period indicated by the date on the soundboard, decoration between and behind the nuts could occur but was not invariable.

The tulip in the middle of the wrestplank in front of the 8' nut
This flower, apart from a small piece of damage which occurred when removing the wrestpins, was completely original and untouched. It was used as a model when reconstructing the other, repainted, tulip, but itself required no attention except in connection with the small piece of soundboard which came out.

THE SOUNDBOARD

The anemone flower
The leaves of this flower had been damaged and covered up with type II repaint where a split which passed through them had been repaired. It looked as though the wood had been scraped when the shim was inserted, and quite a wide path had been made through the paint. P 727.D.6/55 (Plate 10) shows the fully cleaned state. In P 747.D.6/55 (Plate 10) which shows the flower after cleaning and restoration, the dark strip caused by re-staining the de-surfaced soundboard wood to match the old surface can clearly be seen. The red petals of the flower and of the bud, had been touched up with bluish red, and with green type I repaint. When these touches were removed the original paint was seen to be slightly abraded where it crossed the raised bands of early wood, but was otherwise in good condition.

The open tulip
This flower was next to the anemone flower along the bentside and appeared to be untampered with. The chief problem was that the paint had become full of ingrained dirt (or possibly stain) and as a result the colours had become darkened and degraded. Several methods of cleaning were tried, but they made very little difference. P 750.D.6/55 (Plate 11) shows the tulip after cleaning.

Group of small, double red and white flowers
The leaves of this group had been extensively overpainted with bright green type II repaint. In P 712.D.6/55 (Plate 12) they show as dark areas because of their absorption of fluorescence under U.V. light. The flower halfway down the spray and nearest to the bentside had been clumsily touched up with bluish red type I repaint over white type II repaint so that its form had been lost. One or two of the flower buds had been touched up in the same way. P 723.D.6/55 (Plate 12) shows the group after the removal of the repaint and P 750.D.6/55 (Plate 11) records it in the reconstructed state.

The red and yellow ranunculus
This group - the fourth from the tail along the bentside - was in very good condition apart from a length of the stem between the upper and lower groups of leaves which had been painted over with type III repaint. The paint of the flower was slightly rubbed and a very thin red glaze was used in two places to strengthen the form. P 753.D.6/55 (Plate 14) shows the completed state.

The red pomegranate flower
The foliage of this flower at the treble end of the bentside had been damaged where two sets of shims had been inserted at different times. A type II repaint of bright, non-matching green passed over both shims. There was, apparently, only this one layer of paint on the shim made in one piece. The other shim was so narrow and damaged that it was not possible to tell whether there was more than one layer of paint on it. The long shim was left in position and a new one fitted beside it. The repaint was removed (P 722.D.6/55) (Plate 15) and the missing sections of the leaves inpainted to match the surrounding original paint. P 756.D.6/55 (plate 16) shows the restored state.

Group of small, unidentified, white flowers
This group, which lies between the bridges at the wrestplank end of the soundboard, consisted of leaves with flowers which were rather crudely painted. However, a group of this form had obviously always been in this position and the foliage appeared, apart from a few small, well matched touches, to be largely original. We suspected that the flowers were not original and that they may have belonged to the type II group, but as the point could not be proved it was decided to leave the group as it was.

The group of morning glories
This group, lying between the bridges, was in very good condition apart from some small abrasions on one or two of tile flower stems which were carefully inpainted. The squiggle beside the topmost flower is probably a misunderstood tendril. There is no sign that it was ever attached. P 753.D.6/55 (Plate 14) shows the group in its final state.

The pink many-headed flower
This flower between the bridges, which may be a Sweet William, was in fine condition. A dark-to-U.V. repaint (type II) occurred behind the flower heads but as it was an excellent match it was left undisturbed (see P 37a.315.J/35) (Plate 17). The finely-painted, sinuous leaves were overpainted with a type I repaint which destroyed their flat, ribbon-like quality. When the repaints were removed the leaves "read" a great deal better, and the original paint appeared to be undamaged.

The rose group
This group between the bridges was in original condition except for some of the stems, which had been touched up with type III repaint which had turned disturbingly dark, and the topmost bud which had been modified by enlarging the green sepals - again a type III repaint. When these overpaints were removed the form of the bud emerged relatively undamaged (see P 750.D.6/55) (Plate 11).

Unidentified blue flower
This flower, at the tail end of the 8' bridge was in good condition apart from slight abrasions on two of the blue petals or sepals, which were inpainted to preserve the overall form of the flower (see P 750.D.6/55) (Plate 11).

The insect
The bee (?) behind the 4' bridge is almost certainly a later addition, possibly quite a recent one since the paint was sensitive to acetone. Although suspected of being a type I repaint it was allowed to remain.

The chrysanthemum group
This group lies behind the 4' bridge. It was realised at a fairly early stage that the leaves of this group had been partially repainted (see P 675.D.6/55) (Plate 20) with a type II repaint. Once the varnish was removed the repaint was very obvious against the original yellow-green although previously it had been invisible. When the flower was cleaned of varnish we realised that the petals of the lower half of the bloom were very different in quality and in shape from those in the upper half. Not only did they have rounded ends instead of pointed ones, but this section of the flower had been extended to fill up the shape of the resist, and looked as if it had been neatly trimmed with scissors.(P 694.D.6/55) (Plate 21). The colours too, lacked the subtlety and range of those in the remainder of the flower. This repaint, which may have belonged to the type II group, although it was not possible to be quite sure, was removed (some of the original paint was found beneath the repaint) and this section of the flower was reconstructed so as to be closely in keeping in form and colour, with the remainder of the flower. The two damaged leaves and the stem were reconstructed at the same time (P 744.D.6/55) (Plate 22).

The wreath of flowers
The flowers which surround the rose were found to be in a very good state of preservation. When the soft varnish layer was removed, many flowers were found to be partially covered with the older, tougher type of varnish which had been found elsewhere on groups on the soundboard. This suggests that in previous restorations the wreath was cleaned more cautiously than the scattered groups, the restorer preferring to leave the varnish on rather than risk taking paint off. This under layer of varnish was removed completely either using solvents or a scalpel, before the repaints were attended to. A few outlying leaves and green tendrils had been partly removed and retouched with type III repaint which had now become dark, and one repaint of type II occurred against the brown band round the rose on the side nearest the carnation. The old retouches were removed and replaced with matching inpainting.

The brown band round the rose with bronze decoration is extremely sensitive to solvent action. The band could not be cleaned using any of the techniques which had been employed to clean the remainder of the soundboard painting. The problems encountered in cleaning it were similar to those of cleaning the gilded moulding around the soundboard. The safest method was to roll with 65% acetone to gel the coating and to rinse the gel away with white spirit only. It was not possible to remove the varnish from this band completely. While the old varnish and repaints were being removed from the wreath, the band was faced with a substantial layer of wax and tissue to protect it.

The carnation between the bird group and the wreath was relatively undamaged. Small type III retouches occurred where a shim had been inserted and which passed through some of the leaves. Type III paint had been used to touch up the fringed edges of the petals; it had been blobbed on and had now turned a yellowish grey.

The bird group had been fairly extensively added to and over-painted. The bird itself had been at some time touched up to hide a shim which had been inserted. This had given way and the shim was removed during this restoration and a fresh one fitted. The type III retouches, which extended beyond the area of the earlier shim, were removed, as also were two repaints which had been added to cover up a scratch and a dirty patch on the bird's breast feathers. The dirty patch, which appeared to be old varnish, was taken off with a scalpel and the paint underneath this and the other repaints was found to be in good condition. The scratch, and the wood of the new shim were carefully inpainted. The trunk of the tree was very worn and had been touched up with type I repaint. The foliage and the landscape area had been partly repainted, and a mixture of type II and type III repaints were found.

The morpholine-sensitive type II repaint which can be seen in P 713.D.6/55 (Plate 25) at the right hand end, covers one of the shims composed of a number of short pieces. A resist is present on the soundboard at this point but its shape was not even approximately followed by the repaint. About 1"" to the left of it is another shim composed of a single long piece which had also been overpainted broadly. Both the repaints absorb U.V. strongly. The type III repaint at the edge - black paint and grey - overlaps the cut edge of the soundboard wood - evidence that this part of the painting was in fact a later addition made either by Taskin's decorator immediately after the alteration to the registers or at a later date. In view of the poor quality of the additions we think it unlikely that the former is the case, and furthermore, it is uncharacteristic for the painting of this period to extend to the very edge of the soundboard.

On top of this repainted area there were some small groups of blobs and strokes in the bright non-matching green typical of the type II repaint. They show up clearly in P 713.D.6/55 (Plate 25). This was the only place on the soundboard where type II repaint was discovered on top of a type III addition. It was in the course of removing these that the remains of the scallops were discovered. There was no trace of a resist area beneath the paint along the edge of the soundboard, nor was there any original paint left beneath the bush at the right hand end of the landscape although its silhouette was indicated by a resist. The bush was replaced with one which stylistically resembled several other smaller bushes which were part of the original landscape.

Retouching and varnishing
After the repaints were removed, and the soundboard photographed in detail in its fully cleaned state, the areas which needed retouching were isolated with MS2A shiny varnish. The retouches were carried out in Paraloid B72 in xylene using Shellsol 'E' as a retarder. The pigments used were: flake white, ivory black, raw umber, orange madder, cobalt blue, chrome yellow, yellow ochre and crimson lake. In some cases intermediate varnish layers were required. The retouches were sealed in and the soundboard and wrestplank varnished finally using a spray application of MS2A.

OBSERVATIONS MADE DURING RESTORATION

Part 1
Absence of a decorative border along the soundboard edges

The absence of a decorative border along the edges of the soundboard and around the bridges is unusual on decorated French harpsichords of the eighteenth century, and gives the soundboard the effect of being rather sparsely painted However, the course which a border would have followed was seen to be occupied by an undulating band, slightly more darkly stained than the remainder of the soundboard wood, and averaging about 2.5cm wide.

We noticed that it contained a scratch line, following the same course, 7.8mm from the mouldings and bridges (except where the bass ends of the bridges showed signs of alteration and along the edge of the soundboard which is adjacent to the jacks). The darkly stained area was not obvious on the wrestplank, but the scratch line was present around the nuts. These facts made us suspect that there had originally been a border, and this hypothesis was proved to be correct when the blackened tips of scallops were found at the edge of the soundboard where they had been covered by the repaint which extended the bird group (P 14a.334.J/35) (Plate 27).

The dark band can be explained as resulting from the removal of the scallops. These must have been washed or scraped off, and the resulting disturbance of the grain would have meant that when the stain was applied it would have been more readily absorbed in these areas. The scratch line, which was intended as a guide for the layout of the scallops, runs through the whole of the stamped inscription 'REFAIT PAR PASCAL TASKIN A PARIS 1784'. These letters are edged with red paint as though the punches were dipped before being struck, and it would have been impossible to have removed the paint of the scallops and left the red paint undisturbed if the two had been present on the soundboard together. It follows from this that by the time Taskin struck his inscription, the scallops were no longer there. The presence of only the tips of a few scallops at the edge of the soundboard adjacent to the registers, shows that the soundboard was cut away, presumably to accommodate an extra row of jacks. It is generally accepted that Taskin was responsible for increasing the number of registers from three to four, and as there were scallops along this edge of the soundboard when this widening took place, it seems likely that scallops would have been present in all the usual places. It follows from the above that if scallops were present on the instrument when Taskin widened the register slot, but were not present by the time he stamped his inscription on the wrestplank, he must have been responsible for their removal.

Part 2
The rose and its surround

We were asked to investigate particularly the paint of the cast rose and the brown band in the hope of finding out something more about the origin of the instrument. As part of this investigation we took and mounted sections from the paint layers of the bevelled edge of the soundboard surrounding the rose, and from the rose itself. We were able to establish that the cast rose had originally been gilded, that it had then been covered with a layer of red paint (vermilion), and this in turn had been varnished and another layer of gold leaf applied. Another coat of varnish formed the topmost layer. On the bevelled edge of the soundboard wood, greyish paint (lead white + smalt) was present as the bottom layer. The upper part of this layer contained a high proportion of blue particles, but it was not possible to establish, even from the mounted section, whether these two layers had been applied at different times. Over this fairly thick layer was a red paint (vermilion) and above this again, varnish, gilding and a final layer of varnish. There was no varnish between the greyish paint and the red paint.

It was just possible that traces of the name of the maker of the instrument might have survived beneath the brown paint surrounding the rose. This layer of paint was extremely thin, and when looked at under raking light, the undulations of the early and late wood bands showed clearly through it, but no trace could be seen of anything resembling lettering. If a maker's name had existed, it must have been thoroughly removed. We noticed during this inspection that at the point where two repaired leaves occur between a blue flower and the brown band (P30.319.J/35) (Plate 3), the soft early wood was worn away, leaving the late wood standing up in ridges - an effect which is the reverse of that occurring on the remainder of the soundboard, and one which suggests abrasion, possibly sanding.

Partly because the cast rose is believed to have been replaced in 1784, and also because the leaf design painted in bronze powder on the brown band accords closely in style with the interior decoration of the casework (see section on casework), it had been suggested that the brown band also dates from the Taskin rebuild. The presence of the grey paint on the bevel suggests that the brown band was not the first painted surround to the rose because traditionally, on decorated soundboards, the rose was encircled with grey and blue bands which bore the maker's name. The fact that the brown paint of the band lies on top of the bevel decoration means that it must have been applied after the cast rose and the bevel had been decorated, because the vermilion paint and the varnish form an uninterrupted film across the rose and the bevel; but we have no means of determining how much time elapsed between the decoration of the rose and the addition of the brown band.

Part 3
The resists and the soundboard stain

When the soundboard of this instrument was examined carefully, even prior to cleaning, lighter coloured areas which related to the outlines of the painted groups could be seen. When the varnish was removed these areas became still lighter than the surrounding wood. We deduced that the stain, which had been applied to darken the wood, had been prevented from taking in these areas by the resists which must have been present on the soundboard at that date although they are now no longer there. In subsequent cleaning the resists must have been removed and the varnish which was applied afterwards had the effect of preventing the dirt from becoming ingrained in the newly exposed wood of these areas.

It did occur to us that the resists might not be resists at all, but merely places which the craftsman who stained the soundboard had missed when doing the staining in his effort not to go over the flowers with the stain. The soundboard was carefully examined with this possibility in mind and many places were found where the resist extended beyond the tips of flower petals and leaves, and had produced shapes which could only have been created by working from inside the area and not by cutting around the outside edge.

There were in addition, other places where the stain had been applied right up to the edges of groups or had overlapped onto them and had degraded the colour. Stain was also present beneath the extension to the bird group and beneath the two added groups on the wrestplank which have since been removed.

In these places the stain was not as dark as it was on the rest of the soundboard where it had afterwards been covered with varnish, but its presence proved that the staining had been carried out before the first restoration of the soundboard, although it is not possible to say definitely that Taskin was responsible.

Part 4
The red paint and the varnish

We noticed during cleaning that all the red painted areas reacted very similarly to solvent. Our attention was focused on the problem particularly when it came to clean the wrestplank of varnish. Here, the punches which had been used to strike Taskin's inscription, the string gauge lines and the numbers, appeared to have been dipped into red paint. This red paint was so sensitive that it was difficult to remove the varnish by any means and leave the paint untouched. A similar situation occurred when we attempted to remove a layer of varnish which had been applied to the interior of the casework around the wrestplank. Here the red paint gave way before the varnish with nearly every solvent tried.

When the cast rose was investigated and a layer of red paint was discovered beneath the gilding, it too, was tested, and was found to be readily attacked by all but the mildest solvents. This suggests that all these areas of red paint have the same binding medium, and the National Gallery analysis has shown that the vermilion pigment used in each case has similar particle characteristics. It is possible therefore, that they were applied at the same time, or at least, in the same workshop.

The mouldings around the edge of the soundboard were coated with a thick, treacly-looking varnish which was applied over gold leaf, and thus far corresponded with the layers on the cast rose. In the case of the rose, however, the layer beneath consisted of solvent-sensitive red paint, whereas on the moulding below the gilding was bronze powder and varnish, beneath this again paler bronze powder (possibly the same period of application but less oxidized), and finally red casework paint. In the mounted section the paler layer of bronze powder is not apparent, but it was quite distinct in the test section cleaned.

Where the paint layers overlapped at the junction of the moulding and the casework, we found that two layers of red paint had been applied to the casework. The bottom layer was painted straight onto the wood, covering the moulding and the casework The bronze powder in varnish layer, which had been applied after this, extended a little way up the side of the case and its edge had been covered over (and tidied up) by a further application of red paint to the casework. The edge of this layer just overlapped onto the moulding and was just overlapped in turn by the top layer of gold leaf and varnish on the moulding (see drawings of mounted sections).

The juxtaposition of these layers suggests that the gold leaf on the moulding which was so sensitive to solvents, is likely to have been a later application. The layer of bronze powder beneath was more resistant to solvent and must have been contemporary with the application of the casework paint since its edge was sandwiched between two red layers.

Part 5
The casework paint

We understand that it was not unusual for Taskin to scrape down to the bare wood, the casework of an instrument which came into his workshop to be rebuilt. Although we still took sections from the casework paint in an attempt to throw light on his methods of decoration, we thought that we would probably not find evidence of earlier decoration, and in this we were right. On the cheek piece where another piece of wood had been added, the gesso layer was quite thick - perhaps 2mm. At the bottom of this layer we found fine threads, as though muslin had been pasted onto the wood before the gesso was applied. The section we took from the bentside where no thickening piece had been added also showed a thick layer of gesso with no trace of any paint other than the black lacquer of the upper surface. The raised, gilded decoration had been built up by applying gesso on top of the black casework paint, applying a further layer of black over the gesso, and finally by applying the gilding or bronze powder. (See drawing of mounted section). The decoration on both the bentside and the cheek had been built up in this way. The spine too, had been thickened by adding an extra piece of wood along its length, but no traces of paint could be discovered remaining between the layers.

Two versions of a spray of leaves and flowers had been used for the bronze powder decoration around the soundwell. The painting of these had great delicacy and charm, and stylistically appeared to relate closely to the decoration on the outside of the case. We felt that the decoration on the brown band around the rose was, if anything, very slightly inferior in quality, and wondered, in view of the sensitivity of the brown paint, whether it might not have been accidentally damaged and in part repainted. Although the results of these investigations are rather negative, it is possible that more evidence will come to light if the casework is cleaned.

TENTATIVE CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS
The evidence which has enabled us to make the following deductions is contained in the text of the report, mainly in the section "observations made during restoration".

1764 Soundboard decorated on unstained timber with resists, using water soluble medium, and with borders. The rose may have been the fake Couchet one, or another one, and there was almost certainly an inscription round it.

1784 Taskin widens the register slot; alters the position of the bridges; may have inserted the Couchet rose. It was probably he who removed the inscription surrounding it and replaced it with the brown band since it would hardly have been to anyone else's advantage to do so later. If he altered any of the painted groups, the alterations or additions are likely to be almost indistinguishable. He removed the scallops; added the string gauge lines and numbers and his inscription. He may have stained the soundboard but he did not varnish it.

Repairer 1. Added the groups to the wrestplank. He added to the bird group to bring it down to the edge of the soundboard. He improved the petals of the carnation and repainted outlying tendrils and leaves around the wreath. In general he touched up and "improved". He may have cleaned the dirt off the soundboard with a damp cloth, or possibly attempted to remove the stain, going round the flower groups but damaging the outlying bits, hence the touching up. He may have also removed the resists in the process, and, if Taskin was not responsible for adding the stain, he was. If he removed the resists he did not stain the soundboard. He varnished the soundboard with a varnish which went very dark and tough in time (possibly oil-copal).

Repairer 2 (l9th/20th Century). He removed most of the previous repairer's varnish and in doing so damaged several of the groups. He may have used a water-borne solvent such as ammonia, and could have been very confused by the different reactions of the original paint and the additions of the previous restorer. He must have damaged the chrysanthemum group and the anemone on the wrestplank, and have removed the wrestplank tulip. He also rubbed over the addition to the bird group and added some retouches to it himself. He repaired the cracks in the anemone in the tail, the pomegranate flower and in the bird group, where he repainted a bush and the end of the landscape to cover up new shims. The paint he used for touching up could have been egg tempera since by 1976 it was only soluble in morpholine but had not darkened or yellowed. He may have used two types of shim to repair the splits, a single strip for a wide crack and shavings off a plane for thin cracks. If repairer 1 did not remove the resists he did.

The third set of repaints may have been done by repairer 2 immediately before, or during the varnishing; or they may have been done on the occasion of a still later restoration by a repairer 3. Repairer 2 used a soft resin varnish since either repairer 3 or myself had no difficulty in removing it. If there was a repairer 3, he too must have used a soft resin varnish.

PAINT SAMPLES
Samples were taken during the course of the work as the opportunity presented itself. Where the original paint remained undamaged by earlier cleaning, it was in good condition and it was decided not to take samples from the original flower paintings. Samples were taken where slips of wood had accidentally become detached from the wrestplank during the work of removing the tuning pins and plugging the holes. Other sampling was confined to the surround to the cast rose and to the casework.

Samples RB/01-07 were sent for analysis. RB/01-04 and 07 for pigment. RB/05 for pigment and medium, and RB/06 for varnish. Of the remainder of the samples, RB/11-14 and RB/16 and 17 were mounted and sectioned, and the remainder were retained for record purposes.

In the drawings given of the sections, the diameter of the circle in each case is equal to l mm.

Sample RB/01. Wood, red paint and varnish from between the 5's of the 8' tuning pins. The red paint was used in the cuts which marked the changes of string gauge. This pigment may be the same as sample RB/05. Neg. 22a.318.J/35 (Plate 2).
Result. Associated with the Taskin rebuild 1784. A slightly orange-red vermilion of very fine, even particle size.

Sample RB/02. From beside the short 8' g tuning pin. Wood, green paint and varnish. The green paint is from the stem of the tulip; one of the few original flowers on the wrestplank. Neg.26.319.J/35 (Plate 2).
Result. Unfortunately there was very little pigment present in the sample; what there was had become almost inextricably enmeshed in the wood fibres. It is, however, clear that the green colour is given by a mixture of prussian blue and a yellow pigment, probably a yellow lake pigment. (The green is fairly transparent and has no marked crystalline character; in its appearance it resembles a lake pigment.)

Sample RB/03. From the band immediately surrounding the rose. Red paint from under the gilding. The red paint is coated with varnish and is very friable. This sample will contain a small quantity of the grey paint beneath because the surface of the grey layer was relatively rough. The red paint is very sensitive to solvents in the same way as the red casework sample RB/05 is. Neg.30.319.J/35 (Plate 3).
Result. Vermilion, very similar to that found in sample RB/01.

Sample RB/04. Greyish paint containing blue particles from the band immediately surrounding the rose. It forms the bottom layer and is therefore likely to contain some particles of the red paint above it and some fragments of the wood beneath. Neg.30.3l9.J/35 (Plate 3).
Result. Lead white mixed with smalt.

Sample RB/05. Red casework paint taken from an area on the edge of the wrestplank where the paint had overspilled onto a layer of glue and could therefore be easily split off. Neg.32.320.J/35 (Plate 3).
Result (Pigment). Vermilion, as in RB/03. (There seems to be no difference that is at all obvious between the three samples of vermilion examined RB/01, RB/03 and RB/05. All are the same orange-red colour and have similar particle characteristics. The only difference between the vermilion from this harpsichord and that from the green harpsichord is that a larger particle size was found in the vermilion in the uppermost paint layer, (iii), in sample G1.
Result (Medium). Some glue would seem to be present, little or no gum. The paint layer broke up with warming with chloroform. There appeared to be a resinous material extracted, with some wax. Unfortunately the gas chromatograms gave very poorly resolved peaks and it was not possible to confirm the resinous portion.

Sample RB/06. Scraping of varnish from soundboard between the wreath and the 8' bridge. Neg. 36.320.J/35 (Plate 3).
Result. This sample gave a weak indication for glue only. The sample was leached with hot methanol since there appeared to be wax present. (Polish?). (Probably residue from the Robersons cleaning paste. A.M.). A resinous extract was obtained as in RB/05. Once again the gas chromatograms were very poorly resolved, presumably a result of the polymer present. After further treatment to clean up the methyl esters a satisfactory chromatogram was eventually obtained. This again suggested that some form of oil/resin mixture had been used, the resin being of the Pinus type.

Sample RB/07. Sample of bright blue-green paint from shim passing through the leaves of the pomegranate flower at the treble end of the soundboard. This is a repaint which may date from the Dolmetsch restoration. It absorbs U.V. light strongly and did not match the original green paint. It could only be dissolved slowly using morpholine but it showed no sign of having yellowed. Neg. 25.325.J/35 (Plate 4).
Result. Probably mostly prussian blue mixed with a little malachite (probably artificial, green bice). Trace of chalk present (?) and possibly a trace of lead white.

Sample RB/08. White paint from the repainted 'cabbage' flower at the treble end of the wrestplank. The paint fluoresces yellowish under U.V. This sample for record only. Neg 28.326.J/35 (Plate 4).

Sample RB/09. Grey and pink paint from the repainted tulip at the bass end of the wrestplank. For record only. Neg. 30.326.J.35 (Plate 4).

Sample RB/10 . Black casework paint from fall. Checked under U.V. that it contained no retouches. Neg. 33.227.J/35 (Plate 4).

Sample RB/11. Sample from upper face of gilded moulding from varnish through to wood surface. For sectioning.

Sample RB/12. From the vertical face of the interior of the casework. The paint layers separated very easily and had to be consolidated with BEVA before a satisfactory sample could be taken.

Sample RB/13. Paint from the bevelled edge of the soundboard surrounding the cast rose. For sectioning.

Sample RB/14. Red paint, varnish and gold leaf from the rose casting. For sectioning.

Sample RB/15. Dark green paint from one of the added groups on the wrestplank. For record only.

Sample RB/16. Black paint and gesso from centre of cheek piece. For sectioning. Neg. 17a.334.J/35 (Plate 5).

Sample RB/17. Section through painted and raised decoration on bentside. Neg. l9a.335.J/35 (Plate 5).
Note: It was only when this section was examined again later on under better lighting conditions, that we observed the rather granular greyish black coat which had been applied next to the gesso. Possibly this is a very lean foundation coat. The lacquer coats appear to become more translucent towards the surface. The occurrence of the very thin vermilion layer beneath the bronze powder is also interesting. It may well have been applied to enhance the colour of the bronze.

Sample RB/18. Two swabs containing green repaint from the leaves of the chrysanthemum group. For record only.

LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS
List of 5x4 colour transparencies taken of the 1764/83 Goermans/Taskin.

Film Type Collection Number Description
Ektachrome. 692.D.6/54 Wreath. Partly cleaned.
Agfachrome Type L. 743.D.6/54 Wreath. Finished state.
Agfachrome Type L. 745.D.6/54 Chrysanthemum group. Finished state.
Agfachrome Type L. 748.D.6/54 Anemone in tail. Finished state.
Agfachrome Type L. 751.D.6/54 Roses, tulip and blue flower near tail. Finished state.
Agfachrome Type L. 754.D.6/54 Morning glory group. Finished state (and ranunculus).
Agfachrome Type L. 757.D.6/54 Pomegranate flower and small white flowers. Finished state.
Agfachrome Type L. 760.D.6/54 Bird group. Finished state.
Agfachrome Type L. 762a.D.6/54 Sweet William and small red flowers. Finished state.
Agfachrome Type L. 767.D.6/54 Bass end of wrestplank. Finished state.
Agfachrome Type L. 770.D.6/54 Treble end of wrestplank. Finished state.
Agfachrome Type L. 838, 839 & 840.D.6/54 Bracketed exposures of whole instrument.
Agfachrome Type L. 853, 851 & 852.D.6/54 Bracketed exposures of soundboard.
Vericolour negative material. 814, 815 & 816. D.6/54 Bracketed exposures of wreath.
Vericolour negative material. 841, 842 & 843.D.6/54 Bracketed exposures of whole instrument.
Vericolour negative material. 847, 848 & 849.D.6/54 Bracketed exposures of whole instrument.
Black and white negatives. 666.C.6/54 General shot before cleaning.
Black and white negatives. 668.C.8/54 Detail of morning glory group, after cleaning.
Black and white negatives. 672.C.6/54 Detail of blue flower in tail, after cleaning.
Black and white negatives. 674.D.6/55 Detail of chrysanthemum group, partly cleaned.
Black and white negatives. 675.D.6/55 As 674.D.6/55 above, under U.V. illumination.
Black and white negatives. 690.D.6/55 Wreath, partly cleaned.
Black and white negatives. 694.D.6/55 Chrysanthemum group cleaned of varnish but not of repaint.
Black and white negatives. 709.D.6/55 "Cabbage" group on wrestplank. Cleaned of varnish but not of repaint.
Black and white negatives. 710.D.6/55 Two flower groups at bass end of wrestplank. Cleaned of varnish but not of repaint.
Black and white negatives. 711.D.6/55 As 710.D.6/55 above, under U.V. illumination.
Black and white negatives. 712.D.6/55 Group of small red flowers in bentside.
Cleaned of varnish but not of repaint. Under U.V. illumination.
Black and white negatives. 713.D.6/55 Bird group (as 713.D.6/55 above).
Black and white negatives. 716.D.6/55 "Cabbage" group, after removal of repaint. Now identifiable as Anemone de Caen.
Black and white negatives. 720.D.6/55 Later group between 4' and 8' nuts. Record before its removal.
Black and white negatives. 721.D.6/55 Later group between 4' and 8' nuts. Record before its removal.
Black and white negatives. 722.D.6/55 Pomegranate flower at treble end of soundboard. After removal of varnish and repaint.
Black and white negatives. 723.D.6/55 Group of small red flowers in bentside. After removal of varnish and repaint.
Black and white negatives. 724.D.6/55 Bird group. After removal of varnish and repaint.
Black and white negatives. 725.D.6/55 Chrysanthemum group. After removal of varnish and repaint.
Black and white negatives. 727.D.6/55 Anemone group in tail. After removal of varnish and repaint.
Black and white negatives. 742.D.6/55 Wreath and carnation. Finished state.
Black and white negatives. 744.D.6/55 Chrysanthemum group. Finished state.
Black and white negatives. 747.D.6/.55 Anemone group in tail. Finished state.
Black and white negatives. 750.D.6/55 Tulip, roses and blue flower near tail. Finished state.
Black and white negatives. 750.D.6/55 Tulip, roses and blue flower near tail. Finished state.
Black and white negatives. 753.D.6/55 Ranunculus and morning glory groups. Finished state.
Black and white negatives. 756.D.6/55 Pomegranate flower and group of small white flowers. Finished state.
Black and white negatives. 759.D.6/55 Bird group. Finished state.
Black and white negatives. 762.D.6/55 Sweet William and group of small white flowers. Finished state.
Black and white negatives. 766.D.6/55 Bass half of wrestplank. Finished state.
Black and white negatives. 772.D.6/55 Whole wrestplank.
Black and white negatives. 773.D.6/55 Whole wrestplank.
Black and white negatives. 837.D.6/55 Whole instrument. Finished state.
Black and white negatives. 844.D.6/55 Duplicate negative of 837.D.6/55 above.
Black and white negatives. 845.D.6/55 Whole soundboard. Finished state.
Black and white negatives. 846.D.6/55 Duplicate negative of 845.D.6/55 above.


Contents | Home Page | List of Instruments



Last updated: 16 August 2000
Web design - pwillis silliw_luap@hotmail.com
© copyright 2000 The University of Edinburgh
For further information regarding this site contact: webmasters@music.ed.ac.uk