CIMCIM 2007

ICOM Logo CIMCIM

CIMCIM Conference in Vienna, Austria

19-24 August 2007

Schedule and Abstracts of Papers

WEB URL : http://cimcim.icom.museum/ixapt.html

Schedule

 

Monday, 20.08.2007

Location:

Sammlung alter Musikinstrumente (SAM), hall XIV

Neue Burg

Heldenplatz

A – 1010 Vienna

 

09:00 Registration

Participants who join the ICOM pre-conference activities are kindly asked to register at the University of Vienna. The registration-desk opens on Thursday 16th from 14:00-18:30, on Friday 17th from 9:00-16:00 and on Saturday 18th from 9:00-16:00 o’clock (address: Dr. Karl Lueger Ring 1, A-1010 Wien).

 

10:00 Reception

 

10:30 Intermission

 

11:00 Session I:

Instruments owned by famous musicians and celebrities: what can they tell us?

Chair: Gabriele Rossi-Rognoni

 

1. Beatrix Darmstaedter, Musicologist, Sammlung alter Musikinstrumente, Kunsthistorisches Museum Wien

About the miraculous mutation of commodities

 

2. Stefan Bohman, Director of the Music museum in Stockholm

Music as Cultural Heritage: on composer museums and their instruments

 

3. Golnaz Golsabahi, Iran

Music history in the heart of a Museum.

 

4. Martin Kirnbauer, director of the Musikmuseum of the Historisches Museum in Basel

Beethoven’s flute – problems of an authenticated instrument in the Musikmuseum
Basel

 

13:00 Lunch

 

14:30 Session II:

Instruments owned by famous musicians and celebrities: what can they tell us?

Chair: Elizabeth Wells

 

5. Alicja Knast, University of Plymouth, United Kingdom

Ignace Jan Paderewski’s  ‘dangerous liaisons’ with piano manufacturers: Erard, Steinway and Weber

 

6. Robert Adelson, Musée de la Musique de Nice, Palais Lascaris, Nice

Masculinizing the harp: Madame de Genlis and the failed career of Casimir Baecker

 

7. Rudolf Hopfner, Director of the Sammlung alter Musikinstrumente, Kunsthistorisches Museum Wien

Ole Bull’s Violin. An extraordinary fiddle with an even more extraordinary history

 

16:00 Intermission

 

16:30 Session III :

Instruments owned by famous musicians and celebrities: what can they tell us?

Chair : Martin Kirnbauer

 

8. Anne Houssay, Technicienne de conservation, Laboratoire de recherche et de restauration du musée de la musique, Cité de la musique, Paris

A symbolic violin ? Ingres's legacy to the Montauban Museum

 

9. Frances Palmer, Curator, York Gate Collections, Royal Academy of Music, London

Insights provided by workshops for "Revolutionary Violinism" Research thread and for displays

 

17:30 End of session

 

18:30 – 19:30

Demonstration Concert (free)

SAM, room IX

Natasha Korsakova, Violins owned/played by Sir Y. Menuhin, L. Mozart and J. Lanner

Eugenie Russo: Pianofortes owend/played by Clara Schumann and Emperor Franz Joseph

Program: J. S. Bach, C. Schumann, J. Brahms, F. Kreisler etc.

 

-------------------------------------------------------

 

Tuesday, 21.08.2007

Location: SAM

 

10:00 Session IV:

Documenting musical instrument collections

Chair: Ken Moore

 

1. Corinna Weinheimer, Conservator, Dipl.-Rest. (FH), France

Documents relating to musical instruments: Who are they for? How should they be produced?

 

2. Sonja Leggewie, Castle Muiderslot, Amsterdam

The InstruMuse Portal - Sharing information about musical instruments

 

3. Annalisa Bini, Accademia Nazionale di Santa Cecilia, Rome

Documenting and sharing information on S. Cecilia Academy’s musical instruments: the opening of museum’s permanent exhibition and the new database consulting platform

 

11:30 Intermission

 

12:00 Session V:

Documenting musical instrument collections

Chair: Silke Berdux

 

4. Gabriele Rossi-Rognoni and Laura Bognetti, Galleria dell’Accademia – Dipartimento degli Strumenti Musicali, Florence

Printed versus electronic cataloguing

 

5. Patrice Verrier, Responsible for the Documentation at the Musée de la musique, Paris

Documenting a collection of music insruments. Which tools for what kind of public?Example of the Musée de la musique (Paris)

 

6. Jesmael Mataga

Documenting musical collections: Practice in Southern African museums

 

13:30 Lunch

 

14:30 Business Meeting

 

15:30 Work-groups

 

18:30 Evening program

Third Man Museum“, visit and cocktail (free)

 

Evening dinner

 

-------------------------------------------------------

 

Wednesday, 22.08.2007

Location: Technisches Museum Wien (TMW)

Mariahilfer Straße 212

A – 1150 Vienna

 

10:00 Session VI:

Documenting musical instrument collections

Chair: Peter Donhauser

 

7. Mats Krouthén, Curator, Ringve Museum, Trondheim, Norway

Registration of Musical Instruments in Museum Collections in Norway

 

8. Arnold Myers and Heike Fricke, University of Edinburgh

How to Catalogue 900 Instruments in 9 months

 

9. Gerhard Stradner, Vienna

Musical Instruments in the Kärntner Landesmuseum in Klagenfurt, Austria

 

11:30 Intermission

 

12:00 Session VII:

Documenting musical instrument collections

Chair: Arnold Myers

 

10. Silke Berdux, Curator of Musical Instruments, Deutsches Museum Munich

Documentation of the “Thalkirchner Organ” – a close view on one object

 

11. Elizabeth Wells, London

Documenting stringed instruments: a project at the Royal College of Music Museum of Instruments, London

 

12. Alicja Knast, University of Plymouth, United Kingdom

Cataloguing bows: is unification possible?

 

13:30 Lunch

 

14:30 Business Meeting

 

15:30 Work-groups

 

19:30

Concert at the TMW Concert Hall (free)

 

-------------------------------------------------------

 

 

Thursday, 23.08.2007

Excursion (registration and payment at the Sammlung alter Musikinstrumente (SAM), where the CIMCIM-conference takes place)

costs: c. 15,- Euro p. p.

 

Morning:

Rohrau: visit of Haydns birthplace and concert (Richard Fuller, pianoforte)

Castle Rohrau: visit of the Harrach collection

Lunch

Afternoon:

Eisenstadt: visit of the „Haydn House“ and concert (Richard Fuller, pianoforte)

Evening:

Reception at the governance of Burgenland (organized by ICOM)

 

-------------------------------------------------- 

 

ABSTRACTS:

 

Robert Adelson, Musée de la Musique de Nice, Palais Lascaris, Nice

Masculinizing the harp: Madame de Genlis and the failed career of Casimir Baecker

Although the actual instrument has not survived, contemporary descriptions of the harp used by the early nineteenth-century virtuoso Casimir Baecker (b. 1790- d. after 1863) provide enough revealing details to understand that it differed in significant ways from instruments played by his contemporaries. It was a late single-action Erard harp, mounted with strings much thicker and wound ten times more tightly than was customary at the time, resulting in a sound said to have been four times as powerful than a harp with conventional stringing. Baecker also used a seat much higher than normal, often played the harp with a bow, and even performed passages on the unusual “nail violin” (violon de fer) during the course of his harp concerts. His extensive use of harmonics played on both hands, and his mastery of an unusual five-finger technique made him one of the most progressive performers of his time.

Baecker’s unusual modifications to his harp—especially when understood in light of his extensive correspondence with his teacher and adoptive mother, the pedagogue, harpist, and writer Stéphanie-Félicité de Genlis (1746–1830)--offer a rare glimpse into the social reception of the harp at the end of the eighteenth and beginning of the nineteenth centuries in France. Baecker explained his innovations in highly gendered language: “Why should one produce only thin sounds, when one can produce sounds that are full, manly, and vigorous? Why play hunched over, when on can—when one must hold oneself erect in order to pull out of the instrument all the riches that it holds? Why let oneself be dominated by the instrument, when one can dominate it?”

Even though there were notable male harpists at the time, their musical approaches usually conformed with the contemporary view of the harp as a graceful, and “feminine” instrument.  Indeed, most of these male harpists earned their livings by composing and publishing music for domestic consumption by women players. Baecker’s approach, on the other hand, was utterly different, and seemed designed to redefine the harp as a masculine vehicle for musical expression.

Baecker’s experiments on the concert stage will be placed in the broader context of the developments in harp design in the final decades of the eighteenth century (such as the harpe à renforcement of Krumpholtz and Nadermann). Contemporary iconography, as well as the language used in contemporary French treatises for the harp, allow us to trace these technological advances, and also to show how in certain instances they can be considered reactions against the feminization of the harp--a feminization that is unparalleled in its intensity and rapidity in Western art music). Of particular relevance to the story is the role played by Sébastien Erard, who became one of Baecker’s protectors during the harpist’s concert tours in London in 1807-08.

 

Silke Berdux, Curator of Musical Instruments, Deutsches Museum Munich

Documentation of the “Thalkirchner Organ” – a close view on one object

The “Thalkirchner Organ” is acknowledged as one of the oldest surviving church organs in Bavaria. It was built in 1630 by an unknown organ builder for the pilgrimage church of Maria Thalkirchen near Munich. Since 1908 it is one of the highlights in the collection of musical instruments of the Deutsches Museum Munich.

The organ is one of the very few documents of organ building in southern Germany in the early 17th century. According to that it was the starting point of a huge project dealing with the documentation of its construction and history. The work of a team of experts from different fields in cooperation with other institutions has successfully finished only some months ago.

The effect is a detailed description of all parts of the instrument, photographic documentation, computer based technical drawings, x-rays, photogrammetric pictures of the organ, analysis of material, an examination of the organ case and its paintings and comparative look on other instruments connected to the Thalkirchner Organ. 

We now are much more aware of its peculiar features and its history. It became obvious that with the overall construction of the organ has never been changed during the centuries (in regard to organs in Southern Germany and Austria this is extremely rare!). From inscriptions and details of the construction we learn about a replacement and changes of pipes, the tuning and the pitch. In addition to there is evidence about several different layers of paint on the surface of the case.

In my paper I will deal with methodological problems, describe our experiences during research, will discuss our approach as a possible model for other projects and their effect on a history of the ‘Thalkirchner Organ’.

 

Annalisa Bini, Accademia Nazionale di Santa Cecilia, Rome

Documenting and sharing information on S. Cecilia Academy’s musical instruments: the opening of museum’s permanent exhibition and the new database consulting platform

The Accademia Nazionale di Santa Cecilia is now completing a strong activity in documenting its musical instruments collection, in order to present both items and information about them in a renovated and integrated communication system, centred on the new museum’s site, designed by Renzo Piano, which will be inaugurated within the end of the year.

The main aim of the project is to simplify and maximize access to and exchange of information on the collection, for general public, for musicians and for scholars.

For this reason the museum will be in a central position, close to the Santa Cecilia Concert Hall and the new rooms will host both public and reserved spaces, staff offices and deposits, while a new digital database will provide a full and direct on-site / on-line access to the records of each item and to the related digital and physical documents conserved in all the Accademia’s archives (bibliographic, historic, photographic, sound and video files), performing also integrated searches. The project leads to a full review of the inventory and of items’ files; to complete the photographic documentation of all instruments and to a full check of their conservation conditions.

Public spaces will be divided in: a gallery, where part of the collection will be presented to the general public, with the help of texts, images, audio and video presentations; an educational/interactive room, where there will be a continuous activities program for children and adults; a luthier laboratory, which will present an historical part and a modern one, which will be used by museum’s staff and could be seen from the public; a multi-function room, to held conferences, seminaries, concerts; a reserved consulting room for scholars, where they could closely analyse instruments and their documentation, thanks to database consulting sites. Database’s record model includes five sections: identification of the item, description (together with conservation) measurements, digital attachments and documents, bibliography, access.

 

Stefan Bohman, Director of the Music museum in Stockholm

Music as Cultural Heritage: on composer museums and their instruments

“Music as Cultural Heritage” is a key-sentence - the use of music as a heritage, for ideological, social or political reasons. This use can be of functional, symbolic or aesthetic reasons. Often those reasons cooperate.

One important part of the use of music as a Cultural Heritage is to build and to use music museums. And an important part of the music museums in Europe are the composer museums, often the place where the composer were born, where he died or where he lived for a while. We have more than 300 composer museums in Europe today. They have played an important role in the shaping of national identities. And – we have more and more new composer-museums today. They are very interesting as a social phenomenon.

An important part in those composer-museums are, of course, their instruments. They often have a central position in the museums. It is then interesting to look at them as a Cultural Heritage in a functional, symbolic or aesthetic meaning. In for example the Liszt, Kodaly and Bartok museums in Budapest the pianos are central. What do they represent? Or as an other example - in the Grieg museum Troldhaugen in Bergen the piano is very important. It is both a national symbol, a personal representation (Genius Loci) and something to play Griegs music on, with the idea that it makes the music more authentic. The piano is also therefore something to attach stories and anecdotes to.

I want to discuss those questions – how to analyse museums and their instrument as Cultural Heritage? What role do they play in the society?

 

Beatrix Darmstaedter, Musicologist, Sammlung alter Musikinstrumente Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna

About the miraculous mutation of commodities

In times of cultural turns the individuals associated with certain musical instruments gain in importance within the object’s contextualisation at exhibitions and within the collection’s inventories. Persons are defined as realities discussed and treated very similar to the musical instrument respectively the exhibit itself. Some musical instruments giving the impression of objects of utility obtain their position in the context of the exhibition or collection solely because of their connection with celebrities or individuals of local interest. Particularly musical instruments are predestined for these esthetical and ontological mechanisms, for they are, in comparison to other art objects, intrinsically tied to additional and inseparable levels of personal dependencies: the musician (interpret) playing the instrument and the composer (author) writing the music for a certain instrument.

In fact cultural identities are not defined by objects but by subjects. Modern visitors of museums have in general stronger interests in the histories connected with subjects than with objects because they ratiocinate the cognition of themselves on individuals. As a reaction against globalisation and cultural homogenisation local or other particularised identities help to reinforce the appreciation and understanding of regional cultures and their historical development.

The paper focuses on an analysis of the recent acquisitions of the Collection of Ancient Musical Instruments in Vienna (Sammlung alter Musikinstrumente, Kunsthistorisches Museum) from the mentioned perspective, it discusses the “reality subject” as a philosophical phenomenon and develops concepts to integrate the level of individuals to the exhibition of musical instruments.

 

Golnaz Golsabahi, Iran

Music history in the heart of a Museum. 

I would like to talk about one of the most important musicians in Iran, Abol  Hassan Saba.

Perhaps this name is familiar for musicologists who are interested in movements, events and work and study in the field of oriental music. Abol Hassan Saba was one of the most impressive ones who attempted to find a concrete significance and concept, based on the musical rules and scientific theories, for Iranian music. In other hand we can compare him with Bartok. By collecting old Melodies and themes originate in the heart of Iranian tribes in far lands nearly 100 years ago; Saba added a rich collection of unknown melodies to Iranian music. Most of these Melodies belong to the north regions of Iran which are considered now as an inseparable part of musical culture of this country. Surly, we can consider him as one of the first Iranian Musicologist s who concentrated on culture and ethnology of music in different area of Iran and smoothed the hard and difficult way. The house of Abol Hassan Saba, as a place to keep his instruments and note descriptions in Tehran Iran, shows only a part of his attempts and interests in this way.

This small museum which is not very active (because of being private and no sponsor) has a big secret in its heart. This secret is a story of a passionate man who had mixed the music of his land with love. His instruments narrate his attempts and endeavors to teach and train a great generation of contemporary musicians who are indebted to his attempts and endeavors, and his effects on their musical culture, the musicians who are his student directly or indirectly. His collection would be revived by a little effort and endeavor and become an authentic narrator for the history of music in Iran.

In this meeting I will try to introduce this collection in details and present detailed scheme of Saba activities, works and students who are famous masters in Iranian music now. Should organizers allow me and considering the time of meeting, I will play a part of his melodies by my cimbalom (Saba has been one of the greatest players, teachers and composers of cimbalom). In case of agreeing to my lecture, I will be honored to be a member of this big family in the land of greatest musicians and musical ancestors of humankind.

 

Rudolf Hopfner, Director of the Sammlung alter Musikinstrumente, Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna

Ole Bull’s Violin. An extraordinary fiddle with an even more extraordinary history

Among the precious items of Archduke Ferdinand’s Kunst und Wunderkammer in Ambras Castle near Innsbruck was a decorated violin of stunning appearance: In addition to double purfling the fingerboard, tailpiece and back were decorated with beautifully inlayed ornaments. The pegbox is terminated by a carved angels-head. During the wages of the Napoleonic wars the instrument was looted by a french soldier and later came into the possession of Franz Rzehaczek, a Viennese violin collector. Ole Bull, on tour in Austria, happended to see the violin in 1839 and immediately wanted to buy the instrument. Only after the death of Rzehaczek Bull was able to purchase the violin for an enormous sum. He would use the fiddle occasionaly during his long career and finally bequeathed it to the museum of his native town, Bergen in Norway.

 

Anne Houssay, Technicienne de conservation, Laboratoire de recherche et de restauration du musée de la musique, Cité de la musique, Paris

A symbolic violin ? Ingres's legacy to the Montauban Museum

The musée Ingres in Montauban, takes care of a violin donated by the famous painter Ingres, who was also known as a violinist. In French, the expression "avoir un violon d'Ingres" means to practice an art, without it being one's main profession. The study of this instrument at the laboratory of the musée de la musique turned up some surprises. It showed some features inside and outside, as well as set-up details, like bridge shape, neck angle and preceding restorations, that didn't correspond to what one might expect to find in a violin of that period played by a competent amateur. We will show the details leading us to conclusions concerning the relationship between Ingres and this instrument.

 

Martin Kirnbauer, director of the Musikmuseum Basel

Beethoven’s flute – problems of an authenticated instrument in the Musikmuseum
Basel

A four-part boxwood flute has been housed in the Historisches Museum Basel since
1957 (inv.-no. 1957.339.). Rather poor in appearance and craftmanship, it
nevertheless played a very prominent role in the earlier permanent exhibition of the museum. This is due to the fact that the instrument is accompanied by authenticated
documentation proving that the flute belonged to Ludwig van Beethoven. But the
difficult relationship between Beethoven and the flute is well-known. So what
is the documentary value of this flute?

The paper traces the history of the instrument and places it in the context
of comparable objects or relics once owned by Beethoven. A further topic of the paper is the question how to handle such a problematic instrument in a modern exhibition.

 

Alicja Knast, University of Plymouth, United Kingdom

Cataloguing bows: is unification possible?

The project initiated by the Centre for Performance History at the Royal College of Music, London, concerning string instruments and bows has given rise to several questions of an organological nature but has also presented an opportunity to investigate existing sources of such kind.  In instrument collections bows can cause a lot of confusion with their minute differences in measurements and types of design.  The function but also the disposability of bows makes any attempts of documentation even more challenging: replaced frogs, head’s facings and hair are the most common alterations which make an original bow almost non-existing and supposedly not worth further attention.   In spite of the aforementioned conditions some features of a bow can be categorized: measurements divided roughly into two groups - those which are important for musical performance and those which are essential for style and period of construction. The latter is mainly based on a bow's head design, especially its plane geometry.  This paper is a ‘know-how’ proposal for documentation of bows, which can be made by virtually any curator without an organological background. It is not intended to serve as a template for bow copying but instead aims to be helpful for research.

 

Alicja Knast,University of Plymouth, United Kingdom

Ignace Jan Paderewski’s  ‘dangerous liaisons’ with piano manufacturers: Erard, Steinway and Weber

A musician and her/his instrument as a research objective seems to be an endless source of investigations. The personality of a performer, especially a performing composer, radically influences all stages of a musical piece’s existence. If the instruments’ setting is left open then a performer and features of his chosen instrument will have a big impact on the final interpretation.  Looking at the performance further, the type of sound aesthetics a musician tends to extract from available instruments is a basis for performing style, its recognition by an audience and at last but not least its appraisal.

Ignace Jan Paderewski’s case is a spectacular display of implicit knowledge about piano acoustic features made by a manufacturer and its appropriateness for a given repertoire. Consciousness about the effect of a stiff keyboard on a performer's well-being, uneven voicing  etc. is the main topic of his subtle campaigning against a money driven piano trade which on one side enabled him to be one of the most prolific (and wealthy) musicians and on the other side has built financial success on his personality and reputation.  Paderewski’s  relationship with piano makers, especially Steinway and Erard, coined his own interpretations, which fortunately are available today in the form of recordings, but also forced them to consider a musician as a vital component in developing an instrument. Recordings of Paderewski’s performances made on Steinway and Erard’s pianos are considered along with extensive archives held in New Files Archive, Warsaw and La Guardia Community College, Queens, New York.

 

Mats Krouthén, Curator, Ringve Museum, Trondheim, Norway

Registration of Musical Instruments in Museum Collections in Norway

The National Museum Network for Music and Musical Instruments in Norway (Music Network, or MNW) runs a two and a half year inventory project with the aim to revise and register all musical instruments at Norwegian Museums.

Method: The project has received grants from the Norwegian Archive, Library and Museum Authority (ABM-utveckling) and it is directed by Ringve Museum. All museums with governmental support (mainly through the Department of Culture & Church) are included in the project. Over 150 museums are examined, mostly with regional culture history collections. Musical instruments are defined as “objects made with the intention to produce musical sound” and “other objects with any known provenience of being used in a musical context”.

The process is divided into three steps 1) collection and conversion of data entries into a data base (2006-2007) 2) national concept harmonization by working groups in the network (2007-2008) and 3) a public data base version, Musikkinstrumentbasen, at the Internet (end of 2008). A group of documentalists from the MNW carry out the registration and revision work in collaboration with the responsible museums. The focus of the obtained information is quantitative. Data will be collected and updated on a basic level with a few data fields (object, museum number, inscriptions, maximal measurements, provenience and photo).

Preliminary Results & Conclusions: So far the project has shown that the amount of musical instrument (estimated over 7.000 objects) is far beyond the originally expected in Norwegian museums. This can be explained by insufficiency of registration capability of museum items. The name of an object also varies due to various dialects but also as a result of lack of knowledge. However, all variations will be recorded in a special data field. Not surprisingly there is a lack of instruments from the last fifty - sixty years.

The project is welcomed as a test in trying to harmonize one type of museum objects. There is a need for an increasing knowledge on and discussion on organological objects in Norwegian museums. The Musikkinstrumentbasen will therefore serve as a starting point for further projects in the fields of collection policies, conservation, documentation, etc.

 

Sonja Leggewie, Castle Muiderslot, Amsterdam

The InstruMuse Portal - Sharing information about musical instruments

The aim of this paper is to introduce the idea and the possibilities of an (inter-)national internet search engine for musical instrument collections – the InstruMuse Portal. The idea developed during writing my MA thesis in collection management. It is not based on creating a whole new database in which museums would have to enter their data, but to create a connecting layer on top of all the already existing databases, similar to the Google search engine.

“A truly interoperable organisation is able to maximise the value and reuse potential of information under its control. It is also able to exchange this information effectively with other equally interoperable bodies, allowing new knowledge to be generated from the identification of relationships between previously unrelated sets of data.” Eric Miller (Miller, Eric: Interoperability, What is it and Why should I want it?, in: Ariadne Issue 24, <www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue24/interoperability> (01.05.03))

This statement powerfully summarises the advantages of interoperability. Making information about musical instruments available for general research, will enable the increase of knowledge about the history of musical instrument developments, historical performance practice and musical culture in general.

The knowledge in the computer world and the systems to make diverse databases interoperable does exist, it just has to be adapted to the needs of the musical instrument information.

A first step towards interoperability, would be a search engine for the basic information on musical instruments in museum collections. There will be certain steps each museum has to follow in order to have a basic amount of fields and information about their collections in computerised format – a checklist of their collections. Alongside of helping the museums to reach the bare minimum of standards, the project would also need to create the search engine for the Internet. Plus a thesaurus of the existing terminology used in the different systems would also need to be compiled.

Setting up a search engine and enabling museums to reach a common level of standards necessitates cooperation of all participating museums. However, as InstruMuse Portal would be a collaboration between diverse institutions, it would need to be an outside project, hosted by one of the museums.

Beyond these obstacles, the idea is feasible. With an eye to the future of musical instrument collections and the needs of researchers, curators, and instrument lovers, an interoperable database will have lasting benefits. It will save research and communication time, foster collaboration between museums and provide new information on historical and valued instruments. For a collection as challenging to understand as musical instruments, developing a system that will help knowledge sharing, is one important step in unpacking the mysteries, the histories, and the music once played on these instruments.

 

Jesmael Mataga, Documenting musical collections: Practice in Southern African museums

This paper discusses issues in the collection and documentation of musical instruments in African museums. It wishes to explore the current trend in documentation of musical collections in African museums by discussing the approach of a few museums in Southern Africa. With very few musical instrument museums, musical collections are in most cases  part of general museums and documentation may fail to capture the unique various aspects of musical instruments. This paper therefore seeks to make an assessment of the practice of musical instrument documentation in Africa against the current international practice and standards in musical instrument documentation. Case studies will be discussed from museums in Zimbabwe, South Africa and Lesotho.

 

Arnold Myers and Heike Fricke, University of Edinburgh

How to Catalogue 900 Instruments in 9 months

The Edinburgh University Collection of Historic Musical Instruments recently received by bequest one of the richest collections of instruments of any kind, the Sir Nicholas Shackleton Collection of clarinets and other woodwind instruments. Accompanying the bequest of instruments was an endowment to foster the exploitation of the Collection in research and education.

Although parts of the Collection had been known to individual scholars, there was no generally available catalogue or even check-list. This paper outlines the potential uses for such a collection in research, and reasons for the decision to produce a catalogue as a high priority. The cataloguing methodology will be described. Finally, the University of Edinburgh's plans for maintaining the collection documentation and alternative modes of delivery will be discussed.

 

Frances Palmer, Curator, York Gate Collections, Royal Academy of Music, London

Insights provided by workshops for "Revolutionary Violinism" Research thread and for displays

[titolo ricavato dall’abstract – non fornito da lei]

The Royal Academy of Music has a playing collection of some 250 instruments from the violin family, some of these have been played by distinguished players and one or two have been associated with very famous musicians. In 2004, the Arts and Humanities Research Board ( the government funding body for academic research in arts and humanities) supported a year-long investigation into interpretative techniques for use with museum collections of musical instruments. One of the experimental workshops was constructed around the 1734 Stradivari violin played by Habeneck and included readings from his diaries and excerpts from his book of studies played on his own instrument. Building on the success of that event, further events have been built around Viotti and Paganini, when the Cannone Guarneri was briefly on loan from Genoa.

The paper is based on these workshops and the insights which they have provided for our "Revolutionary Violinism" Research thread and for displays of violins in York Gate.

 

Gabriele Rossi-Rognoni and Laura Bognetti, Galleria dell’Accademia – Dipartimento degli Strumenti Musicali, Florence

Printed versus electronic cataloguing:

The larger and larger access to electronic resources in the last few years has led some musical instrument museums to the choice to stop completely the production of printed catalogues and concentrate their resources on sofisticated on- or off-line databases. Together with smaller costs, these allow wider and easier access to the data, virtually no limits of space for photos, texts and documentation, and the possibility to include elements, such as sound, that were hardly ever to be found in printed catalogues. Electronic databases, moreover, are more flexible and potentially very easy to amend or enlarge at any point.

These characteristics make databases an excellent complement, but not necessarily an alternative, to printed catalogues.

This paper aims at raising a discussion between museum curators, starting with the presentation of the policy adopted by the Department of Musical Instruments of the Galleria dell’Accademia in Florence.

 

Gerhard Stradner, Vienna

Musical Instruments in the Kärntner Landesmuseum in Klagenfurt, Austria

Carinthia is a district in Austria which lies in the far south and  boarders on  Italy and Slovenia. The main museum in its capital of Klagenfurt also preserves 186 musical instruments. To this date there exists no printed inventory and therefore in 2008 a book with descriptions and photos will be published. The museum contains many archaeological findings, folk instruments and also some important keyboard instruments.

The musical instruments from a nunnery dedicated to Saint Ursula deserve special attention. These include some recorders, two lutes, which belong to the Austrian and South German mandora-type,  and three viole d´amore. These last three instruments were made by Johann Schorn from Salzburg between 1700 and 1703. Until now we do not know of any music from the early 18th century for three viole d´amore. Perhaps this music has not survived or these three viole d´amore performed other kinds of music for one ore more parts.

A special type of cittern, the Hamburger Cithrinchen, also made by Johann Schorn from Salzburg in 1703, documents the use of  vibrato in baroque era because of  the particular form of its tailpiece.

 

Patrice Verrier, Responsable de la Documentation du Musée de la musique

Documenter une collection d’instruments de musique. Quels outils pour quels publics ? Exemple du Musée de la musique (Paris)

Une collection d’instruments de musique peut intéresser de nombreux publics : au public spécialisé (conservateurs, organologues, chercheurs, facteurs d’instruments) s’ajoutent maintenant de nouveaux interlocuteurs : éditeurs, iconographes, public scolaire et grand public. Conscient de la variété de ces besoins, le Musée de la musique propose une documentation riche et variée où chacun pourra trouver ce qui l’intéresse spécifiquement. En plus de la documentation constituée traditionnellement dans tous les musées (dossiers, catalogues raisonnés, plans, photothèque), il propose sur le portail de la Médiathèque d’autres documents : catalogue en ligne avec accès multicritères, base de données d’enregistrements sonores, visite virtuelle du Musée ou dossiers pédagogiques multimédia.

Documenting musical instruments collections. Which tools for which public ? The Musée de la musique (Paris) as an example.

A musical instruments collection can interest various audiences: a specific professionnal public (curators, organologists, searchers, instrument makers), to whom we should also add new interlocutors such as editors, iconographers, schools and the general public. Conscious of this variety of needs, the Musée de la musique is offering a diversified and very rich documentation, where each and everyone can find a specific interest. In addition to the the basical documents found in all museums like files, catalogues, technical drawings, pictures, it's offering on the Médiathèque website new documents such as on line catalogues with multicriteria access, sounds recordings database, museum virtual tour ou multimedia educational files.

 

Corinna Weinheimer, Conservator, Dipl.-Rest. (FH), France

Documents relating to musical instruments: Who are they for? How should they be produced?

The subject of this paper is restricted to the objects in the collections i.e. the musical instruments. In my experience as a conservator many questions frequently arise when producing documentation. The term “documentation” includes text, pictures and drawings. I would like to use a few examples to demonstrate some difficulties encountered in the presentation of recorded data. Perhaps with some standardisation the situation might be improved.

 

Elizabeth Wells, London

Documenting stringed instruments: a project at the Royal College of Music Museum of Instruments, London.

The Museum was fortunate to receive a grant from the Arts and Humanities Research Council for an eleven-month project to improve access to the collection.  The main objective was the preparation of Catalogue Part III, European Stringed Instruments, with an associated condition audit, conservation work and photography; in addition digital versions of the volumes already published, European Wind Instruments and Keyboard Instruments, were mounted on the Museum’s website (www.cph.rcm.ac.uk).

This paper will discuss issues of documentation in connection with the project, especially with regard to Catalogue Part III, and in the broader context of the documentation that has been undertaken on the collection.   Part III was written by the speaker in collaboration with Christopher Nobbs and is to be published in June 2007; Catalogue Part IV, Bows for Musical Instruments, by Alicja Knast, edited by Jenny Nex, will appear on-line at the same time.

The speaker began work on the collection in 1964 and retired as Curator in 2005.  Since then she has been preparing Part III for publication, as well as an article on the Donaldson Collection, to be published in MMI, March 2007.

 

A programme of the ICOM Conference can be found at

www.icom-oesterreich.at/2007

Further information from:

Dott. Gabriele Rossi-Rognoni
CIMCIM Secretary
c/o Museo degli Strumenti Musicali
Galleria dell'Accademia
via Ricasoli, 60
I - 50122 Firenze - Italy

Return to CIMCIM Welcome Page


This page updated: 13.7.07